Second London Performance
The Sciabin was one of the pieces then played. 'A third
concert, given by Mr. Coates on May 6, 1919 was devoted to Russian
music. Tchaikovsky loomed rather largely in the scheme, being
represented by his 'Romeo and Juliet' and B flat minor Pianoforte
Concerto, played by Miss Katharine Goodson, but it was interesting to
hear Rimsky-Korsakoff's Suite from 'The Legend of Tzar Saltan' with
its invigorating rhythms, and Scriabin's ' Poeme de l'extase.' This
latter work had been heard only once before in London, if memory
serves correctly, and had made a strong impression with its richly
woven design. Intervening years have enabled us to perceive the
strands of the texture more clearly, and to know them as harmonies
which, once considered exotic, are now becoming typical of Marylebone
and Kensington. The skill of Scriabin's weaving is however none the
less open to admiration.' (Musical Times for 1 June 1919) Even at this juncture Scriabin was thought by this critic to be on the side of being a bit passée.
|
Scriabin |
This series of concerts changed the course of Coates' career as they where so well received that he decided to stay in Britain.
The LSO was then trying to re-establish itself after the war and
Coates was quickly appointed their conductor. He decided to forgo any payment for the
first six concerts when he was trying to knock the orchestra into shape. A member of
the orchestra of that time described his rehearsal methods 'Coates
had a lot to give – and he gave it all' (Pearton LSO at 70, p. 60)
Disaster
The effort to get the orchestra up to scratch caused
other problems. The initial series of concerts contained a lot of
music new to the LSO and this may account for at least one disastrous
premier.
'The concert of the 27 October 1919 included the first
performance of Elgar's cello concerto, conducted by composer, 'the
rest of the programme was conducted by Albert Coates, who
overran his rehearsal time [by an hour it seems] at the expense of
Elgar's. Lady Elgar wrote, "that brutal selfish ill-mannered
bounder ... that brute Coates went on rehearsing”. The critic
of The Observer, Ernest Newman, wrote, "There have
been rumours about during the week of inadequate rehearsal. Whatever
the explanation, the sad fact remains that never, in all probability,
has so great an orchestra made so lamentable an exhibition of
itself'' (Wikipedia).
I can't actually find a balanced opinion on this concert
as both Elgar and Coates supporters seem to be at odds over what
happened that evening. My own speculation is that it was probably
Coates being over ambitious in his programming and the orchestra not
being yet strong enough to cope and things just got a little bit scary.
To Liverpool
Still, Coates persisted with the Scriabin, taking the LSO on a tour they
played the piece again at Liverpool. 'The second Philharmonic concert
on November 11th, was in the nature of a personal triumph for Mr.
Albert Coates, who likes to remember his early experiences as a
schoolboy at the Liverpool Institute—a school which has turned out
many clever men—and later as a student of chemistry at the
University of Liverpool, under Sir (then Prof.) Oliver Lodge. Mr.
Coates's fame as a conductor was clearly upheld on this occasion,
when he had drawn up a programme largely of Russian music, with which
he has such intimate acquaintance and evident sympathy. It contained
his master, Rimsky-Korsakov's, 'Procession of Princes,' from
'Mlada,' Liadov's 'Eight Russian Folk Songs,'characteristic trifles,
and Scriabin's ' Poeme de l'Extase,' which was kept to the last and
overtopped all else. Mr. Coates secured a performance of this
extraordinary music which will long dwell in memory. He certainly
managed to convey to his listeners much of the marvel, mystery, and
mastery of the amazing score, which requires seven horns and five
trumpets, gong, bells, celesta, with extra harp, and organ. It is
without doubt a stupendous creation, but ordinary people will find
little comfort in it as music. More pleasure, if less psychology, was
found in Cyril Scott's two 'Passicaglias,' (Musical Times 1 December
1919)
Ezra Pound having an opinion
The Scriabin was programmed yet again for a performance
at the Queen's Hall on the 17th December 1919 and was again
reviewed with some condescension. 'The starred number was the Scriabin
"Poeme d'Extase." Here, as in the Korsakov, Coates showed
his realisation of the capacities of his orchestra, but the extase is
senescent; it is manifestly not the extase of youth; the long
beginning is like the prose of its era, heavy as Henry James or as
Charles Louis Phillippe, fin de siecle, of an extreme and laborious
sophistication, Coates doing admirably, Scriabin conscientiously
avoiding the obvious in everything save the significance, and
treating one of the oldest topics with anatomic minuteness, though
possibly unconscious of his humour, anatomic even to the notes given
on the triangle, spurring one to quotations from Gamier's "Carmen."
The double basses superb, but one longed, possibly, for the older
spirit of English May-day. It is too late to emend the title; we
quarrel with no work of art because of title lightly or sarcastically
given, but we think Scriabin would have been kinder to his audience
if he had labelle this poeme "Satire upon an Old
Gentleman," or possibly "Confessions of Trouble,"
supposing all the time he "knew." We entertain doubts,
however, as to just how far his awareness extended. (Ezra Pound The
New Age 15 January 1920, p. 175)
Belfast unimpressed
By
this time the LSO must have know the piece very well indeed. For
a concert at Belfast on the 16th February 1920 Coates
attempted the Scriabin with another orchestra. 'Chief among these …
was the appearance of the Beecham Symphony Orchestra, with Mr. Albert
Coates conducting, when Belfast musicians and music-lovers had a
treat such as they had not known for a long time. The first part of
the programme was of Wagner numbers, while the second part comprised
Cyril Scott, Liadoff, and Scriabin. The selection was admirable,
although there were probably not many auditors who could honestly say
that they appreciated the ' Poeme de Extase' of the last-named
composer. (Musical Times 1st April 1920)
On his return to London the LSO took to making the
recording. I think the recording has given us a
performance both very well rehearsed and still new enough not to have
become routine. I have listened to several other performances and the energy and subtlety that the LSO and Coates has given us is quite special.
The recording
I confess I was at first slightly confused by sides 1, 2 & 5
being recorded on the 24th April 1920 and sides 3 & 4
on the 5th May 1920 with each session having consecutive
matrix numbers. I believe that the first intention was to market it
as a three sided set with a filler piece. This original intention was
changed when it was thought to try for a complete, or near complete version.
Unfortunately a miscalculation was made when it was found that the
music for the central section could not be fitted onto two sides, and
worse, if the music was stretched to three sides then the records
would look a bit short and buyers would feel short changed. The only
expedient way to avoid making all the sides again was to make a cut, thus a minute of music between sides 4 & 5 is missing,
unfortunately they also managed to loose a couple of bars between
sides 2 & 3. I would think that these points would not be noticed
much when playing the original consecutively, but does cause a bit of
a problem when the whole work is joined together. Still I have done
what I can.
Perils of Recording
Pearson in his book on the LSO at 70 gives an account
of a Coates recording session from the diary of the principle
violinist of the LSO, H. Wynn Reeves. This appears to recount a
recording session for the either the 8th or the 11th
December 1922 or the 18th July 1923 or at least a
conflation of two different events.
'Most of the recording took pace in a small room, the
orchestra being reduced to its lowest possible limit, and we were
crowded together in the endeavour to propel whatever we had to play
into one or two recording bells. Occasionally we did excerpts from
the Ring – this was sheer murder.
'I remember a series we undertook in midsummer one year,
the strings were reduced to 2 × 1sts, 2 × 2nds, 1 va. 1 cello, 1 bass,
the minimum of woodwind, brass and percussion; Billy Reed and I were
playing into No. 1 bell (or horn), our bows being not more than 2
inches from the rim. The music being away back under the bell
necessitated stooping down to see what we had to play; it was my job
to turn the pages; woe betide me if the music rustled or if my bow
touched the bell. Standing behind us with their music stands leaning
on our shoulders, were the woodwind blowing into our ears as loudly
as possible; behind them again were the brass.
|
LSO Brass 1922 |
'High up on my left was Albert Coates conducting.
Immediately below him stood Florence Austral, as Brünnhilde. Coates
quickly discovered that some of her notes jarred the bell, so grabbed
her hair, pulling her forward into the bell for some notes, and
pushing back for the dangerous ones. Try to imagine interpreting
Brünnhilde under these circumstances!
'On the right was another bell for the male chorus of six
and two principles, Robert Parker as Wotan and Robert Radford as
Hagen, the routine being the principles ducked when the chorus had to
sing and vice versa. There was constant pushing and shoving to make
way, all this causing repercussions on the bow arm. High up was an
electric fan on a block of ice perfectly useless as the temperature
registered 95° Fahrenheit!'
This was a more complicated recording arraignment than
that used in the Scriabin which I think had two horns – one for the
main orchestra, strings to the front, brass to the back, and another
side horn for the woodwind. If any of you are still reading this I
give another note, a brief one, below re the the filler side and why the recordings sound different.
The very Leninism of music
The last contemporary review I shall give of this composition,
again from Musical Times, perhaps best of all sums up the sheer
excitement that the LSO under Coates bring.
'During last Whitsuntide [week beginning 24 May 1920],
Mr. Cyril Jenkins, who is the moving spirit of the Welsh Musical
Festival,. temporarily took the matter into his own hands by holding
a two days' competition at Mountain Ash and, by engaging the London
Symphony Orchestra to give two concerts in that town and concerts at
Cardiff,Swansea, and Newport. The five days' Festival, organized on a
lavish scale, was devoted almost exclusively to contemporary music,
and among the British composers represented were Sir Edward Elgar,
Granville Bantock, Julius Harrison, Cyril Jenkins, Dr. Vaughan
Thomas, Delius, Josef Holbrooke, and Dr. Vaughan Williams, the first
five of whom conducted their own works; in addition there was music
by Wagner, Rimsky-Korsakov, Borodin, Scriabin ('Le Poeme
d'Extase'), Dukas and others. These composers, familiar enough to
every concert-goer in London and in the larger provincial towns of
England, are little known in Wales ; so novel were they indeed, and
so incomprehensible to the only partially educated musicians of Wales
were the idioms employed, that one heard on all hands, both from the
Press and the public, that adjective of execration 'revolutionary.'
What to us is familiar daily food is to Wales the very Leninism of
music.
But not all the music proved caviare to the general, for
an overwhelming surprise awaited us at Mountain Ash. The huge
pavilion there accommodated an audience variously estimated at from
5,000 to 7,000 people, most of whom were of the so called working
classes - miners, engineers, and the like. One would have expected
that so novel and hectic a composition as Scriabin's 'Le Poeme
d'Extase' would leave such a gathering bored and contemptuous; but
the exact contrary proved to be the case. Mr. Albert Coates's
interpretation whipped his listeners to an enthusiasm that found vent
in a physical demonstrativeness such as the Albert and Queen's Halls
can never have witnessed: at one point it appeared as though the
complete work would have to be played a second time. It was this
demonstration that made those of us interested in the musical welfare
of Wales feel that we had underestimated the capacity of the working
man in that country to assimilate and understand the more difficult
compositions of modern times; and it was this demonstration which
indicated that, if orchestral music were supplied with some approach
to regularity, Wales would provide the necessary support. (Musical
Times for 1 July 1920)
|
Charles Lecocq |
Lecocq Daughter of Madam Angot
The question of what to put on the 6th side looks an odd choice. An abridged recording of Lecocq Daughter of
Madam Angot was cut by Columbia in August 1919. Seventeen sides
were made, the matrix numbers of these records running from 76568 to
76584. Of these, sixteen sides were issued in an album containing
eight records numbered L1370-1377 in February 1921. This left matrix
76569 without a coupling so some wag thought to put it as the coupling
to the Scriabin – probably giving the purchaser some light relief,
certainly this side has been played a bit more than the other five.
This recording is a very good example of what appears to be a one horn recording –
very clear and well balanced – the album of records where almost
all ensemble pieces so other horns would have been attached for
these but for the orchestra alone they would have been removed. It would have been more complicated and time consuming to
rearrange the orchestra just for a couple of orchestral sections so
the recording room was set up with the orchestra facing one horn and
the singers and chorus other horns. As I have mentioned elsewhere on this blog if you play into one horn some of the sound goes towards cutting the disc but also a certain amount comes out of the other horns - this is not a problem here and so the sound is not as fuddled or unbalanced as that of for the Scriabin.
|
Eugene Goossens III |